|
| 1.4 |
Study Methods and Framework |
| |
|
|
| The study makes use of the following methods to review the existing provisions and aims to provide further insight for readers in their future designs on universal accessibility: |
|
| |
 |
Exchanges with non-governmental organisations (NGO); |
 |
Idea workshops with a rehabilitation complex; |
 |
User feedback on completed projects; |
 |
Survey reports issued by NGOs from their on-site checking of accessibility in the community; |
 |
Technical and field study of parks, open spaces, urban spaces, gardens, rehabilitation gardens, country parks, recreation spaces, beach facilities, children’s playgrounds, sitting-out spaces, linkage between public transport terminus and buildings, linkage in hospitals, tourist attraction spots, barbecue sites, school sensory gardens, promenades, nature reserves; |
 |
Reference to international standards and overseas examples. |
|
| |
| The study report includes review of existing provisions, ideas for improvement, design guidelines and best practices. In addition, to illustrate the best practices on universal accessibility, a photo gallery consisting of good local and overseas examples has been incorporated for reference. Case studies of a rehabilitation complex and an external public space have been carried out to examine the existing provisions, lessons learnt and the key issues of forward planning for a barrier free environment. |
|
 |
|